Czechia vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Czechia
81.92
in 2014
Senegal
82.24
in 2014
Czechia rank
93rd
Senegal rank
92nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Czechia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 82.24 against 81.92 in Czechia, a difference of 0.32.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.2 | 81.72 | 5.48 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 82.76 | 81.31 | 1.45 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Czechia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 82.24 against 81.92 in Czechia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Czechia and Senegal?
- 0.32, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Senegal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Czechia ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.