Czechia vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Czechia
81.92
in 2014
Senegal
82.24
in 2014
Czechia rank
93rd
Senegal rank
92nd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Czechia
  • Senegal
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 82.24 against 81.92 in Czechia, a difference of 0.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 87.2 81.72 5.48 Czechia
2010s 82.76 81.31 1.45 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Czechia or Senegal?
Senegal, at 82.24 against 81.92 in Czechia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Czechia and Senegal?
0.32, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Senegal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Czechia ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.