Croatia vs Spain: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Croatia
79.85
in 2014
Spain
80.39
in 2014
Croatia rank
106th
Spain rank
103rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Croatia
  • Spain
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Spain currently reports 80.39 against 79.85 in Croatia, a difference of 0.54.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 106th and Spain ranks 103rd of 181 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 77.05 82.83 5.78 Spain
2010s 79.6 80.58 0.9829 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Croatia or Spain?
Spain, at 80.39 against 79.85 in Croatia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Croatia and Spain?
0.54, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Spain?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Croatia and Spain rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Croatia ranks 106th and Spain ranks 103rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.