Croatia vs France: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Croatia
79.85
in 2014
France
79.85
in 2014
Croatia rank
106th
France rank
106th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Croatia
  • France
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 79.85 against 79.85 in France, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.

Croatia ranks 106th and France ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and France in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia France Difference Ahead
2000s 77.05 78.6 1.56 France
2010s 79.6 79.33 0.2707 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Croatia or France?
Croatia, at 79.85 against 79.85 in France as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Croatia and France?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and France?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Croatia and France rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Croatia ranks 106th and France ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.