Côte d’Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Côte d’Ivoire
78.65
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea
78.65
in 2014
Côte d’Ivoire rank
117th
Equatorial Guinea rank
117th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 78.65 against 78.65 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d’Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62 | 57.02 | 4.99 | Côte d’Ivoire |
| 2010s | 67.94 | 72.16 | 4.22 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Côte d’Ivoire or Equatorial Guinea?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 78.65 against 78.65 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.