Congo vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Congo
26.25
in 2014
Zimbabwe
16.01
in 2014
Congo rank
171st
Zimbabwe rank
172nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.25 against 16.01 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10.24.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 171st and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.81 | 30.16 | 9.65 | Congo |
| 2010s | 21.82 | 29.06 | 7.24 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 26.25 against 16.01 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 10.24, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Congo ranks 171st and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.