Congo vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Congo
26.25
in 2014
Niger
11.44
in 2014
Congo rank
171st
Niger rank
173rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Congo
  • Niger
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Congo currently reports 26.25 against 11.44 in Niger, a difference of 14.81.

That makes Congo's figure about 2.3 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Niger ahead.

Congo ranks 171st and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 39.81 24.28 15.54 Congo
2010s 21.82 21.77 0.0493 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Congo or Niger?
Congo, at 26.25 against 11.44 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Congo and Niger?
14.81, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Congo and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Congo ranks 171st and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.