Congo vs Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Congo
26.25
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
5.23
in 2014
Congo rank
173rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Congo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.25 against 5.23 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 21.02.
That makes Congo's figure about 5.0 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 173rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.81 | 1.47 | 38.34 | Congo |
| 2010s | 21.82 | 9.92 | 11.9 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Congo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Congo, at 26.25 against 5.23 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Congo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 21.02, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Congo ranks 173rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.