Congo vs Iraq: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Congo
26.25
in 2014
Iraq
31.59
in 2014
Congo rank
171st
Iraq rank
170th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Congo
  • Iraq
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 31.59 against 26.25 in Congo, a difference of 5.34.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 171st and Iraq ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 39.81 1.81 38.01 Congo
2010s 21.82 21.14 0.6774 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Congo or Iraq?
Iraq, at 31.59 against 26.25 in Congo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Congo and Iraq?
5.34, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iraq?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Congo and Iraq rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Congo ranks 171st and Iraq ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.