China vs Tunisia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
China
91
in 2014
Tunisia
91.39
in 2014
China rank
43rd
Tunisia rank
40th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- China
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 91.39 against 91 in China, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.
China ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 40th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.51 | 88.64 | 7.87 | China |
| 2010s | 94.04 | 90.34 | 3.71 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, China or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 91.39 against 91 in China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between China and Tunisia?
- 0.39, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do China and Tunisia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- China ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 40th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.