Chad vs Kyrgyz Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Chad
0
in 2014
Kyrgyz Republic
5.23
in 2014
Chad rank
177th
Kyrgyz Republic rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Chad
- Kyrgyz Republic
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 5.23 against 0 in Chad, a difference of 5.23.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Kyrgyz Republic has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 177th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Kyrgyz Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Kyrgyz Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 1.47 | 1.47 | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2010s | 0 | 9.92 | 9.92 | Kyrgyz Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Chad or Kyrgyz Republic?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 5.23 against 0 in Chad as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Chad and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 5.23, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chad and Kyrgyz Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Chad ranks 177th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.