Central African Republic vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Central African Republic
0
in 2014
Niger
11.44
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
175th
Niger rank
173rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Central African Republic
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 11.44 against 0 in Central African Republic, a difference of 11.44.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 groups.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 24.28 | 24.28 | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 | 21.77 | 21.77 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Central African Republic or Niger?
- Niger, at 11.44 against 0 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Central African Republic and Niger?
- 11.44, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Niger?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Central African Republic ranks 175th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.