Canada vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Canada
72.33
in 2014
Mauritania
73.2
in 2014
Canada rank
137th
Mauritania rank
134th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Canada
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 73.2 against 72.33 in Canada, a difference of 0.87.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 134th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.85 | 65.97 | 4.87 | Canada |
| 2010s | 71.69 | 71.83 | 0.1402 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Canada or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 73.2 against 72.33 in Canada as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Canada and Mauritania?
- 0.87, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Canada and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Canada ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 134th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.