Canada vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Canada
72.33
in 2014
Lesotho
69.83
in 2014
Canada rank
137th
Lesotho rank
140th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Canada
  • Lesotho
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Canada currently reports 72.33 against 69.83 in Lesotho, a difference of 2.5.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 137th and Lesotho ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 70.85 65.09 5.76 Canada
2010s 71.69 68.59 3.1 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Canada or Lesotho?
Canada, at 72.33 against 69.83 in Lesotho as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Canada and Lesotho?
2.5, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Lesotho?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Canada and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Canada ranks 137th and Lesotho ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.