Cambodia vs Fiji: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Cambodia
91.61
in 2014
Fiji
91.72
in 2014
Cambodia rank
38th
Fiji rank
37th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Cambodia
  • Fiji
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 91.72 against 91.61 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.

Cambodia ranks 38th and Fiji ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 88.01 91.63 3.62 Fiji
2010s 91.76 92.29 0.5297 Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Cambodia or Fiji?
Fiji, at 91.72 against 91.61 in Cambodia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Cambodia and Fiji?
0.11, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Fiji?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Fiji rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Cambodia ranks 38th and Fiji ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.