Cambodia vs Denmark: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Cambodia
91.61
in 2014
Denmark
91.61
in 2014
Cambodia rank
38th
Denmark rank
38th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Cambodia
  • Denmark
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 91.61 against 91.61 in Denmark, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.

Cambodia ranks 38th and Denmark ranks 38th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 88.01 90.98 2.97 Denmark
2010s 91.76 90.97 0.7905 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Cambodia or Denmark?
Cambodia, at 91.61 against 91.61 in Denmark as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Cambodia and Denmark?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Denmark?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Denmark rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Cambodia ranks 38th and Denmark ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.