Cape Verde vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Cape Verde
84.42
in 2014
Uruguay
84.42
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
81st
Uruguay rank
81st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Cape Verde
- Uruguay
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 84.42 against 84.42 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.22 | 74.26 | 8.96 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 82.35 | 80.59 | 1.76 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Cape Verde or Uruguay?
- Cape Verde, at 84.42 against 84.42 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Cape Verde and Uruguay?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cape Verde and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Cape Verde ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.