Burundi vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Burundi
45.64
in 2014
Rwanda
38.24
in 2014
Burundi rank
164th
Rwanda rank
166th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Burundi
  • Rwanda
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 45.64 against 38.24 in Rwanda, a difference of 7.4.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Burundi ranks 164th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4854 25.06 24.58 Rwanda
2010s 26.72 51.41 24.69 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Burundi or Rwanda?
Burundi, at 45.64 against 38.24 in Rwanda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Burundi and Rwanda?
7.4, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Burundi ranks 164th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.