Burundi vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Burundi
45.64
in 2014
Mongolia
49.13
in 2014
Burundi rank
164th
Mongolia rank
162nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Burundi
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 49.13 against 45.64 in Burundi, a difference of 3.49.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 164th and Mongolia ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4854 | 11.41 | 10.92 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 26.72 | 39.79 | 13.07 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Burundi or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 49.13 against 45.64 in Burundi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Burundi and Mongolia?
- 3.49, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Mongolia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burundi and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Burundi ranks 164th and Mongolia ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.