Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Burkina Faso
58.71
in 2014
Malawi
61
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
156th
Malawi rank
153rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 61 against 58.71 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 2.29.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 156th and Malawi ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.52 | 16.73 | 31.79 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 55.09 | 49.05 | 6.03 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Burkina Faso or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 61 against 58.71 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 2.29, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 156th and Malawi ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.