Bulgaria vs Guatemala: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Bulgaria
78.98
in 2014
Guatemala
79.41
in 2014
Bulgaria rank
113th
Guatemala rank
110th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Bulgaria
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 79.41 against 78.98 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 113th and Guatemala ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.97 | 64.43 | 4.54 | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 75.7 | 78.69 | 2.99 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bulgaria or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 79.41 against 78.98 in Bulgaria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bulgaria and Guatemala?
- 0.43, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Guatemala?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bulgaria and Guatemala rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Bulgaria ranks 113th and Guatemala ranks 110th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.