Bulgaria vs Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bulgaria
78.98
in 2014
Georgia
79.41
in 2014
Bulgaria rank
113th
Georgia rank
110th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Georgia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 79.41 against 78.98 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.43.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 113th and Georgia ranks 110th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 68.97 66.63 2.34 Bulgaria
2010s 75.7 77.77 2.07 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bulgaria or Georgia?
Georgia, at 79.41 against 78.98 in Bulgaria as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bulgaria and Georgia?
0.43, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Georgia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bulgaria and Georgia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bulgaria ranks 113th and Georgia ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.