Brunei vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Brunei
93.57
in 2014
Seychelles
93.57
in 2014
Brunei rank
24th
Seychelles rank
24th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Brunei
  • Seychelles
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Brunei currently reports 93.57 against 93.57 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei ahead.

Brunei ranks 24th and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 95.54 72.14 23.4 Brunei
2010s 93.17 89.84 3.34 Brunei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Brunei or Seychelles?
Brunei, at 93.57 against 93.57 in Seychelles as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Brunei and Seychelles?
0, with Brunei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Seychelles?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Brunei and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Brunei ranks 24th and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.