Brazil vs Colombia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Brazil
58.33
in 2014
Colombia
57.63
in 2014
Brazil rank
155th
Colombia rank
156th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Brazil
  • Colombia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 58.33 against 57.63 in Colombia, a difference of 0.7.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 155th and Colombia ranks 156th of 181 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Colombia Difference Ahead
2000s 80.07 56.1 23.98 Brazil
2010s 57 56.35 0.6531 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Brazil or Colombia?
Brazil, at 58.33 against 57.63 in Colombia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Brazil and Colombia?
0.7, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Colombia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Brazil and Colombia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Brazil ranks 155th and Colombia ranks 156th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.