Brazil vs Burkina Faso: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Brazil
58.33
in 2014
Burkina Faso
58.71
in 2014
Brazil rank
158th
Burkina Faso rank
157th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Brazil
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 58.71 against 58.33 in Brazil, a difference of 0.38.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 158th and Burkina Faso ranks 157th of 184 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.07 | 48.52 | 31.55 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 57 | 55.09 | 1.91 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Brazil or Burkina Faso?
- Burkina Faso, at 58.71 against 58.33 in Brazil as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Brazil and Burkina Faso?
- 0.38, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Burkina Faso?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Burkina Faso rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Brazil ranks 158th and Burkina Faso ranks 157th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.