Botswana vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Botswana
40.41
in 2014
Rwanda
38.24
in 2014
Botswana rank
165th
Rwanda rank
166th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Botswana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 40.41 against 38.24 in Rwanda, a difference of 2.17.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.33 | 25.06 | 5.27 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 36.52 | 51.41 | 14.89 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Botswana or Rwanda?
- Botswana, at 40.41 against 38.24 in Rwanda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Botswana and Rwanda?
- 2.17, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Botswana and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Botswana ranks 165th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.