Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
81.48
in 2014
Senegal
82.24
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Senegal rank
93rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 82.24 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.76.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Senegal ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Senegal ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.06 | 81.72 | 2.65 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 80.55 | 81.31 | 0.7635 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 82.24 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 0.76, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Senegal ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.