Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
81.48
in 2014
Norway
81.37
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Norway rank
97th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Norway
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 81.48 against 81.37 in Norway, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Norway ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Norway ranks 97th of 184 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.06 | 85.59 | 6.52 | Norway |
| 2010s | 80.55 | 81.59 | 1.04 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Norway?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 81.48 against 81.37 in Norway as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
- 0.11, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Norway ranks 97th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.