Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Czechia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
81.48
in 2014
Czechia
81.92
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Czechia rank
94th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 81.92 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.44.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Czechia ranks 94th of 184 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.06 | 87.2 | 8.13 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 80.55 | 82.76 | 2.21 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 81.92 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 0.44, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th and Czechia ranks 94th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.