Bolivia vs Honduras: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bolivia
77.56
in 2014
Honduras
77.34
in 2014
Bolivia rank
119th
Honduras rank
121st

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bolivia
  • Honduras
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 77.56 against 77.34 in Honduras, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Honduras ahead.

Bolivia ranks 119th and Honduras ranks 121st of 181 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 57.04 73.57 16.53 Honduras
2010s 72.14 78.09 5.95 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bolivia or Honduras?
Bolivia, at 77.56 against 77.34 in Honduras as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bolivia and Honduras?
0.22, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Honduras?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Honduras rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bolivia ranks 119th and Honduras ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.