Bhutan vs Kenya: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bhutan
60.35
in 2014
Kenya
59.8
in 2014
Bhutan rank
152nd
Kenya rank
153rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bhutan
  • Kenya
203040506070200520092014

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 60.35 against 59.8 in Kenya, a difference of 0.55.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 152nd and Kenya ranks 153rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 68.99 33.62 35.38 Bhutan
2010s 51.04 53.79 2.75 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bhutan or Kenya?
Bhutan, at 60.35 against 59.8 in Kenya as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bhutan and Kenya?
0.55, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Kenya?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Kenya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bhutan ranks 152nd and Kenya ranks 153rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.