Bhutan vs Gabon: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bhutan
60.35
in 2014
Gabon
62.2
in 2014
Bhutan rank
152nd
Gabon rank
150th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bhutan
  • Gabon
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 62.2 against 60.35 in Bhutan, a difference of 1.85.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 152nd and Gabon ranks 150th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Gabon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Gabon Difference Ahead
2000s 68.99 56.16 12.83 Bhutan
2010s 51.04 62.26 11.22 Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bhutan or Gabon?
Gabon, at 62.2 against 60.35 in Bhutan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bhutan and Gabon?
1.85, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Gabon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Gabon rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bhutan ranks 152nd and Gabon ranks 150th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.