Benin vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Benin
86.01
in 2014
Yemen
85.73
in 2014
Benin rank
74th
Yemen rank
75th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Benin
  • Yemen
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Benin currently reports 86.01 against 85.73 in Yemen, a difference of 0.28.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Benin ahead.

Benin ranks 74th and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 81.27 71.6 9.67 Benin
2010s 84.26 84.48 0.2125 Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Benin or Yemen?
Benin, at 86.01 against 85.73 in Yemen as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Benin and Yemen?
0.28, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Yemen?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Benin and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Benin ranks 74th and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.