Belgium vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Belgium
81.92
in 2014
Senegal
82.24
in 2014
Belgium rank
93rd
Senegal rank
92nd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Belgium
  • Senegal
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 82.24 against 81.92 in Belgium, a difference of 0.32.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 78.38 81.72 3.34 Senegal
2010s 80.91 81.31 0.4024 Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Belgium or Senegal?
Senegal, at 82.24 against 81.92 in Belgium as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Belgium and Senegal?
0.32, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Senegal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belgium and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Belgium ranks 93rd and Senegal ranks 92nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.