Belgium vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Belgium
81.92
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina
81.48
in 2014
Belgium rank
94th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
96th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 81.92 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 94th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.38 | 79.06 | 0.6869 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 80.91 | 80.55 | 0.3612 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Belgium or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Belgium, at 81.92 against 81.48 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.44, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Belgium ranks 94th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 96th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.