Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Belarus
77.12
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
77.39
in 2014
Belarus rank
122nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
120th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Belarus
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 77.39 against 77.12 in Belarus, a difference of 0.27.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 122nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 120th of 181 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 71.65 | 71.65 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 38.14 | 76.84 | 38.7 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Belarus or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 77.39 against 77.12 in Belarus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.27, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Belarus ranks 122nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 120th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.