Belarus vs Bolivia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Belarus
77.12
in 2014
Bolivia
77.56
in 2014
Belarus rank
122nd
Bolivia rank
119th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Belarus
  • Bolivia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 77.56 against 77.12 in Belarus, a difference of 0.44.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 122nd and Bolivia ranks 119th of 181 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bolivia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 57.04 57.04 Bolivia
2010s 38.14 72.14 34 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Belarus or Bolivia?
Bolivia, at 77.56 against 77.12 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Belarus and Bolivia?
0.44, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bolivia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Bolivia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Belarus ranks 122nd and Bolivia ranks 119th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.