Bangladesh vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Bangladesh
81.02
in 2014
Comoros
80.72
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
98th
Comoros rank
100th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Bangladesh
- Comoros
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 81.02 against 80.72 in Comoros, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 98th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.4 | 76.09 | 1.69 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 79.62 | 79.6 | 0.0229 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bangladesh or Comoros?
- Bangladesh, at 81.02 against 80.72 in Comoros as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bangladesh and Comoros?
- 0.3, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Comoros?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Bangladesh ranks 98th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.