Bahrain vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Bahrain
91.29
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
91.39
in 2014
Bahrain rank
42nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
40th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Bahrain
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 91.39 against 91.29 in Bahrain, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 42nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 40th of 183 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.58 | 97.7 | 11.13 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 88.06 | 93.53 | 5.47 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Bahrain or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 91.39 against 91.29 in Bahrain as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Bahrain ranks 42nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 40th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.