Bahamas vs Germany: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bahamas
87.04
in 2014
Germany
86.82
in 2014
Bahamas rank
62nd
Germany rank
64th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bahamas
  • Germany
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 87.04 against 86.82 in Germany, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Germany ahead.

Bahamas ranks 62nd and Germany ranks 64th of 181 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Germany Difference Ahead
2000s 86.73 89.06 2.33 Germany
2010s 86.85 88.11 1.25 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bahamas or Germany?
Bahamas, at 87.04 against 86.82 in Germany as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bahamas and Germany?
0.22, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Germany?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahamas and Germany rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bahamas ranks 62nd and Germany ranks 64th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.