Azerbaijan vs Iraq: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Azerbaijan
33.55
in 2014
Iraq
31.59
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
168th
Iraq rank
170th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Azerbaijan
- Iraq
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 33.55 against 31.59 in Iraq, a difference of 1.96.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 168th and Iraq ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.52 | 1.81 | 2.72 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 23.36 | 21.14 | 2.22 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Azerbaijan or Iraq?
- Azerbaijan, at 33.55 against 31.59 in Iraq as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 1.96, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Iraq rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Azerbaijan ranks 168th and Iraq ranks 170th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.