Azerbaijan vs Congo: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Azerbaijan
33.55
in 2014
Congo
26.25
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
168th
Congo rank
171st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Azerbaijan
- Congo
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 33.55 against 26.25 in Congo, a difference of 7.3.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 168th and Congo ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.52 | 39.81 | 35.29 | Congo |
| 2010s | 23.36 | 21.82 | 1.54 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Azerbaijan or Congo?
- Azerbaijan, at 33.55 against 26.25 in Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Azerbaijan and Congo?
- 7.3, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Azerbaijan ranks 168th and Congo ranks 171st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.