Austria vs Madagascar: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Austria
83.88
in 2014
Madagascar
82.9
in 2014
Austria rank
84th
Madagascar rank
87th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Austria
- Madagascar
How they compare
Austria currently reports 83.88 against 82.9 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.98.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 84th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 181 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.57 | 60.78 | 23.79 | Austria |
| 2010s | 83.26 | 78.58 | 4.68 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Austria or Madagascar?
- Austria, at 83.88 against 82.9 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Austria and Madagascar?
- 0.98, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Madagascar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Madagascar rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Austria ranks 84th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.