Australia vs United States: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Australia
82.79
in 2014
United States
82.27
in 2014
Australia rank
90th
United States rank
92nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Australia
- United States
How they compare
Australia currently reports 82.79 against 82.27 in United States, a difference of 0.52.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States ahead.
Australia ranks 90th and United States ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.09 | 84.74 | 2.65 | United States |
| 2010s | 84.27 | 83.85 | 0.4223 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Australia or United States?
- Australia, at 82.79 against 82.27 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Australia and United States?
- 0.52, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and United States rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Australia ranks 90th and United States ranks 92nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.