Armenia vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to export … export US container DB06-15
Armenia
67.86
in 2014
Eswatini
65.8
in 2014
Armenia rank
148th
Eswatini rank
150th
Trading across borders: Cost to export … export US container DB06-15 over time
- Armenia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 67.86 against 65.8 in Eswatini, a difference of 2.06.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 148th and Eswatini ranks 150th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.15 | 38.43 | 21.72 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 56.68 | 60.62 | 3.95 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Armenia or Eswatini?
- Armenia, at 67.86 against 65.8 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Armenia and Eswatini?
- 2.06, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Armenia ranks 148th and Eswatini ranks 150th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.