Argentina vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Argentina
70.37
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
72
in 2014
Argentina rank
142nd
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
139th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Argentina
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 72 against 70.37 in Argentina, a difference of 1.63.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Argentina ranks 142nd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.64 | 52.94 | 12.3 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 59.63 | 63.81 | 4.18 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Argentina or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 72 against 70.37 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 1.63, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Argentina ranks 142nd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.