Argentina vs Eritrea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Argentina
70.37
in 2014
Eritrea
68.63
in 2014
Argentina rank
139th
Eritrea rank
142nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Argentina
- Eritrea
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 70.37 against 68.63 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.74.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eritrea ahead.
Argentina ranks 139th and Eritrea ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.39 | 13.57 | 5.82 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 59.63 | 59.02 | 0.6086 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Argentina or Eritrea?
- Argentina, at 70.37 against 68.63 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Argentina and Eritrea?
- 1.74, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eritrea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Eritrea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Argentina ranks 139th and Eritrea ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.