Argentina vs Canada: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Argentina
70.37
in 2014
Canada
72.33
in 2014
Argentina rank
139th
Canada rank
137th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Argentina
  • Canada
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Canada currently reports 72.33 against 70.37 in Argentina, a difference of 1.96.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 139th and Canada ranks 137th of 181 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Canada Difference Ahead
2000s 19.39 70.85 51.45 Canada
2010s 59.63 71.69 12.06 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Argentina or Canada?
Canada, at 72.33 against 70.37 in Argentina as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Argentina and Canada?
1.96, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Canada?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Argentina and Canada rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Argentina ranks 139th and Canada ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.