Antigua and Barbuda vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Antigua and Barbuda
85.19
in 2014
Mozambique
84.97
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
79th
Mozambique rank
81st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Mozambique
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 85.19 against 84.97 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.22.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Mozambique ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.04 | 70.96 | 9.08 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 84.55 | 81.79 | 2.77 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Mozambique?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 85.19 against 84.97 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique?
- 0.22, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Mozambique ranks 81st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.