Antigua and Barbuda vs Kuwait: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Antigua and Barbuda
85.19
in 2014
Kuwait
85.29
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
79th
Kuwait rank
78th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 85.29 against 85.19 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Kuwait ranks 78th of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.04 | 73.89 | 6.14 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 84.55 | 81.12 | 3.43 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 85.29 against 85.19 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait?
- 0.1, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Kuwait ranks 78th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.