Angola vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Angola
64.05
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
65.47
in 2014
Angola rank
151st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
150th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Angola
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 65.47 against 64.05 in Angola, a difference of 1.42.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 151st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 150th of 183 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.33 | 72.19 | 46.86 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 53.65 | 76.74 | 23.08 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Angola or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 65.47 against 64.05 in Angola as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Angola and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1.42, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Angola ranks 151st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 150th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.